Guralp Systems Limited
ART 3.0 - Strong-Motion Analysis and Research Tool

Chapter 5. References

Abrahamson, N. A., & Silva, W. J. (1997), Empirical response spectral attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 94–127.

Ambraseys, N. N., & Douglas, J. (2003), Near-field horizontal and vertical earthquake ground motions. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 23(1), 1–18.

Ambraseys, N. N., & Simpson, K. A. (1996), Prediction of vertical response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25(4), 401–412.

Ambraseys, N. N., Simpson, K. A., & Bommer, J. J. (1996), Prediction of horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 25(4), 371–400.

Ambraseys, N. N., Douglas, J., Sarma, S. K., & Smit, P. M. (2005a), Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: Horizontal peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 3(1), 1–53.

Ambraseys, N. N., Douglas, J., Sarma, S. K., & Smit, P. M. (2005b), Equations for the estimation of strong ground motions from shallow crustal earthquakes using data from Europe and the Middle East: Vertical peak ground acceleration and spectral acceleration. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 3(1), 55–73.

Arias, A. (1970), A measure of earthquake intensity, Seismic Design for Nuclear Power Plants (ed. R.J. Hansen), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 438-483.

Atkinson, G. M. and Boore, D. M. (1997), Some comparisons between recent ground-motion relations. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 24–40.

Atkinson, G. M., & Boore, D. M. (2003), Empirical ground-motion relations for subduction zone earthquakes and their application to Cascadia and other regions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(4), 1703–1729.

Beaudet, P. R. & Wolfson, S. J. (1970), Digital filters for response spectra, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 60(3), 1001-1013.

Berge-Thierry, C., Cotton, F., Scotti, O., Griot-Pommera, D.-A., & Fukushima, Y. (2003), New empirical response spectral attenuation laws for moderate European earthquakes. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 7(2), 193–222.

Bindi, D., Luzi, L., Pacor, F., Franceshina, G., & Castro, R. R. (2006), Ground-motion predictions from empirical attenuation relationships versus recorded data: The case of the 1997–1998 Umbria-Marche, central Italy, strong-motion data set. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 96(3), 984–1002.

Bommer, J. J. & Martinez-Pereira (1999), The effective duration of earthquake strong motion, Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3(2), 127-172.

Bommer, J. J., Magenes, G., Hancock, J., Penazzo, P. (2004), The influence of strong motion duration on the seismic response of masonry structures, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2(1), 1-26. DOI: 10.1023/B:BEEE.0000038948.95616.bf.

Boore, D. M., Joyner, W. B., & Fumal, T. E. (1997), Equations for estimating horizontal response spectra and peak acceleration from western North American earthquakes: A summary of recent work. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 128–153.

Campbell, K. W. (1997), Empirical near-source attenuation relationships for horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 154–179.

Campbell, K. W., & Bozorgnia, Y. (2003a), Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(1), 314–331.

Campbell, K. W., & Bozorgnia, Y. (2003b), Erratum: Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(3), 1413.

Campbell, K. W., & Bozorgnia, Y. (2003c), Erratum: Updated near-source ground-motion (attenuation) relations for the horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration and acceleration response spectra. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 93(4), 1872.

Chapman, M. C. (1999), On the use of elastic input energy for seismic hazard analysis, Earthquake Spectra, 15(4), 607-635.

Consortium of Organizations for Strong-Motion Observation Systems (2001), COSMOS Strong Motion Data Format, Version 1.20, August 15.

Converse, A. M. & Brady, A.G. (1992), BAP: Basic Strong-Motion Accelerogram Processing Software Version 1.0, Open-File Report 92-296A, U.S. Geological Survey.

Crouse, C. B. (1991), Ground-motion attenuation equations for earthquakes on the Cascadia subduction zones. Earthquake Spectra, 7(2), 201–236.

Douglas, J. (2003), Earthquake ground motion estimation using strong-motion records: A review of equations for the estimation of peak ground acceleration and response spectral ordinates. Earth-Science Reviews, 61(1-2), 43–104.

Douglas, J. (2004a), Ground motion estimation equations 1964–2003: Reissue of ESEE Report No. 01-1: ‘A comprehensive worldwide summary of strong-motion attenuation relationships for peak ground acceleration and spectral ordinates (1969 to 2000)’ with corrections and additions. Technical Report 04-001-SM, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering; Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine; London; U.K.

Douglas, J. (2006), Errata of and additions to ‘Ground motion estimation equations 1964–2003’. Intermediary report RP-54603-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France.

Douglas, J. (2008), Further errata of and additions to ‘Ground motion estimation equations 1964-2003’. Final report RP-56187-FR, BRGM, Orléans, France.

Electric Power Research Institute (2006), Program on Technology Innovation: Use of Cumulative Absolute Velocity (CAV) in Determining Effects of Small Magnitude Earthquakes on Seismic Hazard Analyses. EPRI, Palo Alto, CA, and the U.S. Department of Energy, Germantown, MD: 2006 1014099.

European Committee for Standardization (2002). Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance Part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Tech. rept. Doc CEN/TC250/SC8/N317. Central Secretariat: rue de Stassart 36, B1050 Brussels.

Hancock, J. & Bommer, J. J. (2005), The effective number of cycles of earthquake ground motion, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 34, 637-664.

International Code Council, Inc. (2000). 2000 International Building Code. USA: International Code Council, Inc.

International Conference of Building Officials (1997). 1997 Uniform Building Code. Vol. 2. Whittier, USA: International Conference of Building Officials.

Internet Site for European Strong-Motion Data (2002), https://www.isesd.cv.ic.ac.uk

Iwan, W. D. (1997), The drift spectrum: a measure of demand for earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE), 123, 397–404.

K-NET (2002), About K-NET data format, https://www.k-net.bosai.go.jp/k-net/man/knetform_en.html

Kramer, S. L. (1996), Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall.

Kalkan, E., & Gülkan, P. (2004), Site-dependent spectra derived from ground motion records in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra, 20(4), 1111–1138.

Lussou, P., Bard, P. Y., Cotton, F., & Fukushima, Y. (2001), Seismic design regulation codes: Contribution of K-Net data to site effect evaluation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 5(1), 13–33.

National Strong-Motion Program (2002), SMC-format Data files, https://escweb.wr.usgs.gov/nsmp-data/smcfmt.html

Nuttli, O.W. (1979), The relation of sustained maximum ground acceleration and velocity to earthquake intensity and magnitude, Miscellaneous Paper S-71-1, Report 16, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Not seen.

Ozbey, C., Sari, A., Manuel, L., Erdik, M., & Fahjan, Y. (2004), An empirical attenuation relationship for northwestern Turkey ground motion using a random effects approach. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 24, 115–125.

PEER Strong Motion Database (2002), https://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/data.html.

Rathje, E.M., Faraj, F., Russell, S., & Bray, J.D. (2004), Empirical relationships for frequency content parameters of earthquake ground motions, Earthquake Spectra, 20(1), 119-144.

Sabetta, F., & Pugliese, A. (1996), Estimation of response spectra and simulation of nonstationary earthquake ground motions. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 86(2), 337–352.

Sadigh, K., Chang, C.-Y., Egan, J. A., Makdisi, F., & Youngs, R. R. (1997), Attenuation relationships for shallow crustal earthquakes based on California strong motion data. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 180–189.

Sarma, S. K. (1971), Energy flux of strong earthquakes, Tectonophysics, 11, 159-173.

Sarma, S. K. & Yang, K. S. (1987), An evaluation of strong motion records and a new parameter A95, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 15(1), 119-132.

Shakal, A. F. & Huang, M. J. (1985), Standard tape format for CSMIP strong-motion data tapes, California Strong Motion Instrumentation Program, Report OSMS 85-03.

Sokolov, V. & Furumura, T. (2008), Comparative analysis of two methods for instrumental intensity estimations using the database accumulated during recent large earthquakes in Japan, Earthquake Spectra, 24(2), 513-532.

Spudich, P., Joyner, W. B., Lindh, A. G., Boore, D. M., Margaris, B. M., & Fletcher, J. B. (1999), SEA99: A revised ground motion prediction relation for use in extensional tectonic regimes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 89(5), 1156–1170.

Toro, G.R., Abrahamson, N.A. & Schneider, J.F. (1997). Model of strong ground motions from earthquakes in Central and Eastern North America: Best estimates and uncertainties. Seismological Research Letters 68(1), 41-57.

Wang, L.-J. (1996), Processing of near-field earthquake accelerograms, Report no. EERL 96-04, Earthquake Engineering Research Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.

Youngs, R. R., Chiou, S.-J., Silva, W. J., & Humphrey, J. R. (1997). Strong ground motion attenuation relationships for subduction zone earthquakes. Seismological Research Letters, 68(1), 58–73.

Zonno, G., & Montaldo, V. (2002). Analysis of strong ground motions to evaluate regional attenuation relationships. Annals of Geophysics, 45(3–4), 439–454.